Seahawks

Officiating Error in Arizona-Seahawks Game 3rd of its Kind

View Comments
credit: Jamie Squire/Getty Images

Seattle Seahawks
Upcoming Games

Buy Seahawks Tickets Full Schedule
Sunday Dec 14
vs. 49ers
Sunday Dec 28
vs. Rams
Seahawks Central
Shop for Seahawks Gear
NFL Scoreboard
NFL Standings
Team STATS
Team Schedule
Team Roster
Team Injuries

NEW YORK (AP) — The replacement officials’ error that awarded an extra timeout to Seattle in the final minute of its loss at Arizona was the third such mistake in an NFL game in the last nine years.

In 2009, the Cleveland Browns were mistakenly awarded four timeouts in the second half of a 16-0 home loss to Baltimore. And in 2003, the Baltimore Ravens got four in a 44-41 overtime win against Seattle.

On Sunday, Seahawks coach Pete Carroll called timeout with 30 seconds left, but the officials had announced two plays earlier Seattle used its last one when receiver Doug Baldwin was injured. After huddling, the officials determined the previous stoppage had been on an incomplete pass, so the Seahawks were not charged with a timeout.

Teams are required to use a timeout for an injured player in the final two minutes, whether the clock is running or not.

The NFL is using replacement officials while the regular officials are locked out.

“It was my error,” referee Bruce Hermansen said in a statement after the Cardinals won 20-16. “We gave them (Seattle) the additional timeout because of the incomplete pass stopping the clock before the injury occurred. When in effect, the clock has no bearing on the play at all, whether it’s stopped or running, we should not have given them the additional timeout.”

Arizona still held Seattle out of the end zone on that drive and won.

In 2003, again in a close game involving the Seahawks, Baltimore called for its final timeout with 58 seconds remaining. But the Ravens weren’t charged for it because the clock had stopped due to a penalty flag being thrown against Seattle.

However, after the officials discussed the situation, the penalty was rescinded. The clock was not restarted at the proper time, though, so the Ravens wound up using that third timeout and having more time remaining than there should have been.

Baltimore didn’t score then, but won the game in overtime.

In 2009, one of Cleveland’s timeouts, called in the third quarter, was not recorded by the officials. So the Browns wound up also getting three timeouts in the fourth period.

That hardly mattered because they were shut out.

– Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.

View Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,175 other followers